Identity, Purpose and Belonging
April 28, 2011 at 5:49 pm 5 comments
In mid-2005 then Mission and Ministry Executive Director John Gilmore and I travelled to the US. Our plan was to observe how several different Christian ‘tribes’ were engaging a transition towards being mission-shaped. We met with two Presbyterian Synods and two Mennonite Conferences, as well as a number of church leaders from a Capella Churches of Christ that coalesce around Abilene Christian University. It was a formative time in the reimagination of Churches of Christ in Vic/Tas as a tribe aligned around mission. That process was ignited by a range of voices, including FORGE, the International Missional Team, and an ongoing conversation with Alan Roxburgh.
One of the key things we noticed in the US was each group’s willingness to seek clarity around identity and purpose.
In 2006 Dean Phelan as Conference President took up this conversation. He wrote often on themes of identity and purpose. In late 2006 the Conference Council, in its first year of operation, had a Dreaming Day from which emerged 4 Challenges for Churches of Christ in Vic/Tas. The 4 Challenges are: Leadership, Growth and Health, Spirituality, and Identity and Purpose. The Growth and Health Challenge included the notion of “strengthening the connectedness between Partner Departments, churches and communities”. The Identity and Purpose Challenge included issues related to “who we are and what we’re doing here”.
These 4 Challenges have set the agenda for Council and the Departments since then, with a particular focus in this period on identity, purpose and belonging.
In October 2007 the first Vic/Tas Dreaming Day was held, facilitated by Dean. Background papers engaging the challenges were released. Churches were invited to dwell on the themes of the Challenges around biblical texts and contemporary writings. Ideas shared and questions raised were opened up for further dialogue via an ongoing blog.
At the AGMs of 2008 and 2009 four Affiliation discussion papers were released and responses sought and received. The two 2009 papers included extensive background to the notions of a covenant for affiliated churches (including a list of benefits and responsibilities) and a percentage basis for Affiliation Fees. In late 2009 Regional Conversations were held in city and country, and feedback was collected. A second Dreaming Day was held in October 2010, followed by further Regional Conversations in early 2011. All this was supported by other papers and an ongoing blog conversation.
Throughout this period there have been many conversations, formal and informal, planned and unplanned. We are committed to listening each other into free speech. Whatever some may say, you can never have enough conversations! Of course as ever, it is impossible to get everybody in the room (or on the same theme) all at once. We accept that not everybody has been present in the conversation. We have therefore always worked on the principle of “the people there are those who want to be there, those who need to be there, and we will work with whoever is there”. Every conversation, including the tense ones that looked to some people a bit like disunity, added (and still adds) something helpful and unique to the process.
Notwithstanding all this, we understand that some churches and church leaders require more time to better (or further) consider who we are, what we’re here for, and what it means to belong to Churches of Christ in Vic/Tas. That’s why we are seeking ‘in principle’ support for the Affirmation document as the basis for an agreement at the AGM on May 14, and why we are proposing to hold a Special General Meeting on a suitable date in October to decide its final shape.
Thanks for being part of the conversation.
Paul Cameron—Executive Officer
~
And have you seen the items in our last blog post?
~
Entry filed under: Covenant/Belonging, History, Overview, Where to from here?. Tags: Belonging, Challenges, dreaming, identity, leadership, missional, spirituality.

1.
Jeanette Jackson | April 28, 2011 at 7:24 pm
I never knew there were so many steps to get to where we are now. Thank you for laying it out like that.
So this process has been defined by those 4 challenges. And the Affirmation document and these recent discussions are coming out of the Identity and Purpose challenge.
It is a hard question. How to make clear who we are and what we are and what it means and how it is defined without it being seen as constraining and divisive. Well, I don’t know the answer but I appreciate the difficulty!
I don’t know how you will be able to get it all to a place where everyone will agree with it. Its difficult to get one local church to agree on one statement like a Mission Statement, let alone thousands of people from all over two states who mostly don’t know each other at all. I hope people can respect and trust the spirit of it even if there are some parts that they think should be this way or that.
I will be praying…
2.
CofCVT | April 28, 2011 at 7:50 pm
Thank you for your prayers Jeanette! This whole process is an important one and your prayers for our churches, the Movement and the process are invaluable.
3.
Robyn Millership | April 29, 2011 at 10:34 am
What a wonderful opportunity we have as a Movement to demonstrate the Christian value of Koininia or Cooperation! A basic and foundational value of God’s people in the churches and among our churches. Our Movement has the opportunity to re affirm our commitment to fulfill the words of Christ, ” so that they may be one” We can do together what cannot be done alone. Unity not uniformity, diversity not disunity. Unity comes as Jesus indicated in John 17 from the same relationship with the Father and the Son. Unity is at the heart of the affinity document seeking to bring Gods people together with one heart beat. I believe God is working in and through our Movement in His plan to touch the world, this opportunity is a God given one and in and through the power of the Holy Spirit we can be one.
This is my prayer
4.
Andrew Menzies | April 29, 2011 at 10:50 am
Thanks for this background Paul. It not only provides some informative context but expresses a graciousness and wilingness to embrace diversity while also ‘getting on with it’ together. I am excited to be a part of something like this. I am excited to lead our theological college to partner in this and offer our particular strengths in the conversation and the journey. (Phil 3:12-4:1)
5.
Dean Phelan | April 29, 2011 at 1:22 pm
Thanks Paul. I have continued to follow the Vic/Tas conference with great interest (how could I not?) and enjoyed reading and reflecting on your highlights of the mission journey since 2005 that I shared some part of.
I commend you on your commitment, determination and leadership in keeping the focus on the important things through this period. History will judge it well.
As the conversations around identity and covenant continue, I encourage all of our leaders to openly look beyond their own patch, and with generosity and wisdom to see again the world shaking vision of the Kingdom of God painted by our founder Jesus Christ. The ideals and spirit of the New Testament that we (Churches of Christ) aspire to restore, calls us to be one Church known by our love of God and for one another. If we truly focus on being and doing this (which Jesus asks us to do) , I think the matters of autonomy and covenant are seen in a clearer light.
With very best wishes for your May Conference (from beautiful, sunny Qld – well, sunny when it’s not flooding or being blown away by cyclones).